August 11, 2006

Let's Talk About TracFones

I don't want to rain on anybodies parade or anything, but can anybody tell me why you would need thousands of cell phones to blow up a dozen or so airplanes?

I didn't think so.

So why the barrage of young Islamic men buying thousands of these things? Try this theory on for size.

The phones were not bought as trigger mechanisms for bombs. Instead they were bought precisely for the reason those buying them have said.

For resale at a high profit.

They also told officers they get stopped frequently and say they buy the phones for $20 and sell them elsewhere for $38. They sell them without the packaging or charger.

Sell the charger for an additional small fee, and you've doubled your money.

Now, this begs the question, who would pay twice the going rate for a phone?

The obvious, but uninformative answer is "Someone who can't buy one through a regular outlet." So let's try a little deduction to see if we can narrow this group down a bit.

So, can anybody think of a large population (thousands) in the US who might want an untraceable cell phone? That might not feel comfortable, or able, to go into a store and buy one on their own? That might need a phone with low cost international rates?

The picture begins to clear now, doesn't it? You don't need thousands of phones for triggers unless you're going to make thousands of bombs. On the other hand, thousands of phones, sold for a $20 profit under the table, means thousands of dollars of untraceable cash for our Islamic buddies (Don't call them terrorists or fascists!) to fund their next practical joke.

By dealing with illegals, the transaction is off the grid, evading all the surveillance methods DHS, and the NSA are using.

This makes more sense and is a bit less frightening than the idea of thousands of terrorist bombs spread all over the US, ready to explode at the touch of a speed dial button.

Posted by Rich at August 11, 2006 8:40 PM | TrackBack
Comments

These are base model GSM phones with custom Tracfone firmware. You can buy them at Mall-Wart for $20 each, but the firmware locks you into buying minutes from Tracfone. The phones are subsidized. It's like giving away the razor handle just to get someone hooked on buying the special quintuplet flex head aloe enhanced beard scrapers.

I'm pretty sure that they are buying the phones (sold as a loss leader), wiping the firmware, and then ebaying them for a bit of scratch. That turns a locked phone into a phone that will work on any GSM system. You don't really sign a contract, so you really aren't breaking the law here, but Tracfone sure doesn't like it.

http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004414.php

Another scheme involves buying cigarettes in South Carolina (with a tax rate of 7¢ per pack) and reselling them in New York city where the tax rate is $1.50 for the state and $1.50 for the city. Smuggling is illegal, but a case could be made that the oppressive NYC cancer stick tax, and by extension New York City itself, is supporting terrorism.

Posted by: Standard Mischief on August 12, 2006 11:50 AM

Your post and Standard Mischief's comment make me rethink this.

Manual trackback: http://dimer.tamu.edu/simplog/archive.php?blogid=3&pid=4005

Posted by: Jim Hu on August 13, 2006 6:02 PM

RE: resell of TracFones.

Mokia has sued poeple who resell Nokia TracFones for large profits because the reseller hack into the software and change the code for illegal uses. More there than meets the eye.
Check this out:
http://www.copyright.gov/1201/2006/reply/14granick_WA.pdf

Posted by: Richard on August 14, 2006 1:06 PM


Don't forget that another popular use for cell phones is as a detonator for IEDs over in the Middle East. Since they can only use one per bomb they are going to need a quite a few of them given the current rate of bombing going on all over the middle east.

It may be just for profit but,....

Posted by: Lynn Sebourn on August 15, 2006 7:22 AM

i think we should have free ring tones because we dont have a noth money to get a reall cell phone and our parents wont sing a contract

Posted by: jesse dycus on March 28, 2007 3:55 PM
Post a comment