That's a good question! Andrew Sullivan posts a good response to the critics of President Bush's policy towards Iraq:
Here's a simple test for the best liberal columnist in the country: if he were president and he were responsible for the security of American citizens, and if he had had a wake-up call like 9/11, how long would he sit around before he acted to prevent something far, far worse? And if that meant a difficult but necessary war against Saddam, on what grounds should a responsible president punt?
Succinctly put. Any takers?
Posted by Rich at July 12, 2002 12:11 AM